Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402372›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2024

Cognitive restraint, uncontrolled eating, and emotional eating. The Italian version of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-Revised 18 (TFEQ-R-18): a three-step validation study.

Alessandro Alberto Rossi, Giada Pietrabissa, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Stefania Mannarini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Exploring the Intersection of Gender Identity and Eating Behaviours in Gender-Diverse Populations.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. War, diet, and PTSD in Ukrainian youth.Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Profile of maladaptive and normative eating behaviors in correlation with rumination: a cross-sectional study among Lebanese adults.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro Alberto RossiDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, Section of Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. a.rossi@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-5999
Giada PietrabissaClinical Psychology Research Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5911-5748
Gianluca CastelnuovoClinical Psychology Research Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2633-9822
Stefania MannariniDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, Section of Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8446-785X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-Revised 18 (TFEQ-R-18) is an extensively used questionnaire to measure three transdiagnostic features of eating behavior: cognitive restraint, uncontrolled eating, and emotional eating.

objectiveThis research aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the TFEQ-R-18 in three large community samples.

methodCross-sectional research designs were employed. In Study 1 (N = 537), an exploratory graph analysis (EGA) was used to examine item clustering within the TFEQ-R-18. In Study 2 (N = 645), a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test its structural validity. In Study 3 (N = 346), a MANOVA was employed assessing mean differences across eating disorders (e.g., anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder).

resultsIn Study 1, the EGA accurately identified the three original dimensions of the TFEQ-R-18. Study 2 showed that the Italian TFEQ-R-18 has good fit indexes (CFI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.064; 90% CI [0.058, 0.070], SRMR = 0.062), and possesses robust psychometric properties. Study 3 reveals distinct, statistically significant differences among eating disorders.

conclusionThe TFEQ-R-18 proves to be a concise and precise tool for measuring transdiagnostic eating behaviors. Its applicability in the Italian context, supported by robust psychometric properties, suggests its utility for both research and clinical purposes. The findings affirm its potential to inform interventions aimed at enhancing psychological health. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, descriptive study.

Indexed as

EmotionsFeeding BehaviorCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansItalyPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitive restraintConfirmatory factor analysisEating behaviorEating disordersEmotional eatingExploratory graph analysisThree-Factor Eating QuestionnaireUncontrolled eating

Identifiers

PMID38402372
PMCPMC10894126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.