ArticleScientific reports2024
Extracting interpretable features for pathologists using weakly supervised learning to predict p16 expression in oropharyngeal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence predictsVeterinary pathology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Basics for Head and Neck Pathologists: A Simple Guide.Head and neck pathology · 2026Review
- Single‑center weakly supervised deep learning prediction of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and HER2 status in colorectal cancer from histopathology images using internal cross‑validation.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- A Weakly Supervised Approach for HPV Status Prediction in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma from H&E-Stained Slides.Cancers · 2025Article
- Performance analysis of Leica Biosystems p16 monoclonal antibody in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Human Papillomavirus Status Prediction for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2024Article
- Predicting lymph node recurrence in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma: collaboration between artificial intelligence and pathologists.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One drawback of existing artificial intelligence (AI)-based histopathological prediction models is the lack of interpretability. The objective of this study is to extract p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) features in a form that can be interpreted by pathologists using AI model. We constructed a model for predicting p16 expression using a dataset of whole-slide images from 114 OPSCC biopsy cases. We used the clustering-constrained attention-based multiple-instance learning (CLAM) model, a weakly supervised learning approach. To improve performance, we incorporated tumor annotation into the model (Annot-CLAM) and achieved the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.905. Utilizing the image patches on which the model focused, we examined the features of model interest via histopathologic morphological analysis and cycle-consistent adversarial network (CycleGAN) image translation. The histopathologic morphological analysis evaluated the histopathological characteristics of image patches, revealing significant differences in the numbers of nuclei, the perimeters of the nuclei, and the intercellular bridges between p16-negative and p16-positive image patches. By using the CycleGAN-converted images, we confirmed that the sizes and densities of nuclei are significantly converted. This novel approach improves interpretability in histopathological morphology-based AI models and contributes to the advancement of clinically valuable histopathological morphological features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.