ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Deep Learning for Perfusion Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Volume (CBV) Predictions and Diagnostics.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pressure-targeted neurocritical care at the bedside: the emerging role of transcranial doppler.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Advances in artificial intelligence for neuroimaging.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- EDRNet-based adolescent idiopathic scoliosis screening method using bare-back images.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- MR-AIV reveals in vivo brain-wide fluid flow with physics-informed AI.Science advances · 2026Article
- Hyperintense Signals in Cerebral Blood Flow Maps of Mice Acquired with Pseudo-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- MR-AIV revealsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion (DSC-MRP) is a non-invasive imaging technique for hemodynamic measurements. Various perfusion parameters, such as cerebral blood volume (CBV) and cerebral blood flow (CBF), can be derived from DSC-MRP, hence this non-invasive imaging protocol is widely used clinically for the diagnosis and assessment of intracranial pathologies. Currently, most institutions use commercially available software to compute the perfusion parametric maps. However, these conventional methods often have limitations, such as being time-consuming and sensitive to user input, which can lead to inconsistent results; this highlights the need for a more robust and efficient approach like deep learning. Using the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) perfusion maps generated by FDA-approved software, we trained a multistage deep learning model. The model, featuring a combination of a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) and a 2D U-Net encoder-decoder network, processes each 4D MRP dataset by integrating temporal and spatial features of the brain for voxel-wise perfusion parameters prediction. An auxiliary model, with similar architecture, but trained with truncated datasets that had fewer time-points, was designed to explore the contribution of temporal features. Both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated, deep learning-generated rCBV and rCBF maps showcased effective integration of temporal and spatial data, producing comprehensive predictions for the entire brain volume. Our deep learning model provides a robust and efficient approach for calculating perfusion parameters, demonstrating comparable performance to FDA-approved commercial software, and potentially mitigating the challenges inherent to traditional techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.