Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402276›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Empirical exploration of whale optimisation algorithm for heart disease prediction.

Stephen Akatore Atimbire, Justice Kwame Appati, Ebenezer Owusu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen Akatore AtimbireDepartment of Computer Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Justice Kwame AppatiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. jkappati@ug.edu.gh.
Ebenezer OwusuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
University of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart Diseases have the highest mortality worldwide, necessitating precise predictive models for early risk assessment. Much existing research has focused on improving model accuracy with single datasets, often neglecting the need for comprehensive evaluation metrics and utilization of different datasets in the same domain (heart disease). This research introduces a heart disease risk prediction approach by harnessing the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) for feature selection and implementing a comprehensive evaluation framework. The study leverages five distinct datasets, including the combined dataset comprising the Cleveland, Long Beach VA, Switzerland, and Hungarian heart disease datasets. The others are the Z-AlizadehSani, Framingham, South African, and Cleveland heart datasets. The WOA-guided feature selection identifies optimal features, subsequently integrated into ten classification models. Comprehensive model evaluation reveals significant improvements across critical performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. These enhancements consistently outperform state-of-the-art methods using the same dataset, validating the effectiveness of our methodology. The comprehensive evaluation framework provides a robust assessment of the model's adaptability, underscoring the WOA's effectiveness in identifying optimal features in multiple datasets in the same domain.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesWhalesAlgorithmsAnimalsBenchmarkingHeartHumansAccuracyFeature selectionHeart diseaseSwarm intelligenceWhale optimization

Identifiers

PMID38402276
PMCPMC10894250
OpenAlexW4392129349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.