ArticleScientific reports2024
Empirical exploration of whale optimisation algorithm for heart disease prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A hybrid feature selection framework combining Artificial Bee Colony and decision trees for CVD risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of machine learning and deep learning models for heart disease prediction in a small clinical dataset.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2026Article
- Exploration and comparison of the effectiveness of swarm intelligence algorithm in early identification of cardiovascular disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart Diseases have the highest mortality worldwide, necessitating precise predictive models for early risk assessment. Much existing research has focused on improving model accuracy with single datasets, often neglecting the need for comprehensive evaluation metrics and utilization of different datasets in the same domain (heart disease). This research introduces a heart disease risk prediction approach by harnessing the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) for feature selection and implementing a comprehensive evaluation framework. The study leverages five distinct datasets, including the combined dataset comprising the Cleveland, Long Beach VA, Switzerland, and Hungarian heart disease datasets. The others are the Z-AlizadehSani, Framingham, South African, and Cleveland heart datasets. The WOA-guided feature selection identifies optimal features, subsequently integrated into ten classification models. Comprehensive model evaluation reveals significant improvements across critical performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. These enhancements consistently outperform state-of-the-art methods using the same dataset, validating the effectiveness of our methodology. The comprehensive evaluation framework provides a robust assessment of the model's adaptability, underscoring the WOA's effectiveness in identifying optimal features in multiple datasets in the same domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.