SynthesisBMC oral health2024
Artificial intelligence for radiographic imaging detection of caries lesions: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06984029 (Development of Artificial Intelligence Model for Automized Dental Caries Detection Vs Expert Decision), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of Artificial Intelligence Model for Automized Dental Caries Detection Vs Expert Decision: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence in dental imaging: a systematic review of interpretability and the current state of trust evidence.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning-based algorithms in laryngoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting alveolar nerve injury and the difficulty level of extraction impacted third molars: a systematic review of deep learning approaches.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning algorithms enhance the accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of dental caries: a comparative study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Trial
- A narrative review of artificial intelligence in dental imaging: from dataset design to clinical translation.Oral radiology · 2026Review
- From Clinic to Community: An Interpretable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Enamel Caries Detection to Support Public Health Dentistry.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Dental Caries Detection Across Clinical Imaging Modalities: A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models for Detecting Odontogenic Keratocytes on CBCT Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Limitations of off-the-shelf multimodal foundation models in secondary caries detection on interproximal radiographs.Odontology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT and teledentistry compared with dentist examination in detecting dental caries: preliminary diagnostic accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Novel AI-Based Software in the Detection of Dental Caries on Bitewing and Intraoral Periapical Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Modulating Oral Microbiota to Prevent Dental Caries: A Microbial Ecology Approach.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Zero-shot detection of apical periodontitis on periapical radiographs using multimodal large language models: diagnostic accuracy and error patterns.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Benchmarking GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok 4, and other LLMs on pediatric dentistry questions from a dental specialization exam.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Detection and Classification of Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using a Deep Learning Approach.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Managerial Feasibility of an AI-Based Tooth-Percussion Signal Screening Concept for Dental Caries: An In Silico Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Short-Wave Infrared Reflectance at 1050-1550 nm for Proximal Caries Detection: An In Vitro Diagnostic Accuracy Study Validated by Micro-CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Class Malocclusion Detection on Standardized Intraoral Photographs Using YOLOv11.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models designed for the detection of caries lesion (CL). MATERIALS AND
methodsAn electronic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, LILACS and Embase databases for retrospective, prospective and cross-sectional studies published until January 2023, using the following keywords: artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN), radiology, detection, diagnosis and dental caries (DC). The quality assessment was performed using the guidelines of QUADAS-2.
resultsTwenty articles that met the selection criteria were evaluated. Five studies were performed on periapical radiographs, nine on bitewings, and six on orthopantomography. The number of imaging examinations included ranged from 15 to 2900. Four studies investigated ANN models, fifteen CNN models, and two DCNN models. Twelve were retrospective studies, six cross-sectional and two prospective. The following diagnostic performance was achieved in detecting CL: sensitivity from 0.44 to 0.86, specificity from 0.85 to 0.98, precision from 0.50 to 0.94, PPV (Positive Predictive Value) 0.86, NPV (Negative Predictive Value) 0.95, accuracy from 0.73 to 0.98, area under the curve (AUC) from 0.84 to 0.98, intersection over union of 0.3-0.4 and 0.78, Dice coefficient 0.66 and 0.88, F1-score from 0.64 to 0.92. According to the QUADAS-2 evaluation, most studies exhibited a low risk of bias.
conclusionAI-based models have demonstrated good diagnostic performance, potentially being an important aid in CL detection. Some limitations of these studies are related to the size and heterogeneity of the datasets. Future studies need to rely on comparable, large, and clinically meaningful datasets. PROTOCOL: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023470708.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.