Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402191›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2024

Artificial intelligence for radiographic imaging detection of caries lesions: a systematic review.

Domenico Albano, Vanessa Galiano, Mariachiara Basile, Filippo Di Luca, Salvatore Gitto, Carmelo Messina, Maria Grazia Cagetti, Massimo Del Fabbro, Gianluca Martino Tartaglia, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06984029 (Development of Artificial Intelligence Model for Automized Dental Caries Detection Vs Expert Decision), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06984029 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of Artificial Intelligence Model for Automized Dental Caries Detection Vs Expert Decision: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNoura Nageh Ramadan AhmedRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsDental Caries
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning-based algorithms in laryngoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Domenico AlbanoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. albanodomenico.md@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-9861
Vanessa GalianoSchool of Dentistry, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
Mariachiara BasilePostgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Filippo Di LucaPostgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Salvatore GittoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Carmelo MessinaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Maria Grazia CagettiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca Martino TartagliaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca Maria SconfienzaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models designed for the detection of caries lesion (CL). MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, LILACS and Embase databases for retrospective, prospective and cross-sectional studies published until January 2023, using the following keywords: artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN), radiology, detection, diagnosis and dental caries (DC). The quality assessment was performed using the guidelines of QUADAS-2.

resultsTwenty articles that met the selection criteria were evaluated. Five studies were performed on periapical radiographs, nine on bitewings, and six on orthopantomography. The number of imaging examinations included ranged from 15 to 2900. Four studies investigated ANN models, fifteen CNN models, and two DCNN models. Twelve were retrospective studies, six cross-sectional and two prospective. The following diagnostic performance was achieved in detecting CL: sensitivity from 0.44 to 0.86, specificity from 0.85 to 0.98, precision from 0.50 to 0.94, PPV (Positive Predictive Value) 0.86, NPV (Negative Predictive Value) 0.95, accuracy from 0.73 to 0.98, area under the curve (AUC) from 0.84 to 0.98, intersection over union of 0.3-0.4 and 0.78, Dice coefficient 0.66 and 0.88, F1-score from 0.64 to 0.92. According to the QUADAS-2 evaluation, most studies exhibited a low risk of bias.

conclusionAI-based models have demonstrated good diagnostic performance, potentially being an important aid in CL detection. Some limitations of these studies are related to the size and heterogeneity of the datasets. Future studies need to rely on comparable, large, and clinically meaningful datasets. PROTOCOL: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023470708.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDental CariesDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, DentalSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceCaries lesionDetectionDiagnosisRadiographic imaging

Identifiers

PMID38402191
PMCPMC10894487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.