ArticlePlant methods2024
Predicting abiotic stress-responsive miRNA in plants based on multi-source features fusion and graph neural network.
Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- AI-Augmented Multi-Omics for Abiotic Stress Responses: A New Frontier in Plant Hormone Systems Biology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unlocking Grass Stress Resistance: Fungal Endophyte-Mediated Pathogen Recognition and RNA Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- The pipelines of deep learning-based plant image processing.Quantitative plant biology · 2025Review
- Genome-wide identiffcation of the WRKY gene family in poplar and the positive role of PsnWRKY95 in response to cadmium stress.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore and more studies show that miRNA plays a crucial role in plants' response to different abiotic stresses. However, traditional experimental methods are often expensive and inefficient, so it is important to develop efficient and economical computational methods. Although researchers have developed machine learning-based method, the information of miRNAs and abiotic stresses has not been fully exploited. Therefore, we propose a novel approach based on graph neural networks for predicting potential miRNA-abiotic stress associations.
resultsIn this study, we fully considered the multi-source feature information from miRNAs and abiotic stresses, and calculated and integrated the similarity network of miRNA and abiotic stress from different feature perspectives using multiple similarity measures. Then, the above multi-source similarity network and association information between miRNAs and abiotic stresses are effectively fused through heterogeneous networks. Subsequently, the Restart Random Walk (RWR) algorithm is employed to extract global structural information from heterogeneous networks, providing feature vectors for miRNA and abiotic stress. After that, we utilized the graph autoencoder based on GIN (Graph Isomorphism Networks) to learn and reconstruct a miRNA-abiotic stress association matrix to obtain potential miRNA-abiotic stress associations. The experimental results show that our model is superior to all known methods in predicting potential miRNA-abiotic stress associations, and the AUPR and AUC metrics of our model achieve 98.24% and 97.43%, respectively, under five-fold cross-validation.
conclusionsThe robustness and effectiveness of our proposed model position it as a valuable approach for advancing the field of miRNA-abiotic stress association prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.