Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38402012›Full record

ReviewAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Acne treatment challenges - Recommendations of Latin American expert consensus.

Marco Rocha, Franz Barnes, Jemena Calderón, Leonel Fierro-Arias, Carlos Eduardo Montealegre Gomez, Carla Munoz, Obregón Jannell, Patricia Troieli

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Marco RochaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: marcoderm@hotmail.com.
Franz BarnesIberolatin-American College of Dermatology (CILAD), Panamá City, Panama.
Jemena CalderónSociedad Ecuatoriana de Dermatologia, Ecuador.
Leonel Fierro-AriasHospital General de Mexico and American British Cowdray (ABC) Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico; Mexican Society of Dermatologic & Oncologic Surgery, Iberolatin-American College of Dermatology (CILAD), Mexico City, Mexico.
Carlos Eduardo Montealegre GomezUniversidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia; Asociación Colombiana de Dermatología y Cirugía Dermatológica, Medellin, Colombia.
Carla MunozClinica Santa Maria, Santiago de Chile, Chile; Sociedad Chilena Dermatología and Iberolatin-American College of Dermatology (CILAD), Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Obregón JannellLima Dermatology Center Clinic and Esthetic, Lima, Peru; Sociedad Peruana de Dermatologia, Lima, Peru.
Patricia TroieliSchool of Medicine University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Argentine Dermatology Society, Iberolatin-American College of Dermatology (CILAD), American Academy of Dermatology and European Academy of Dermatology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Clinica Santa Maria · CLForum Solidaridad Perú · PEIbero American University · MXInstituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas · ECSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia · BRUniversidad de Antioquia · COUniversidad de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcne is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the pilosebaceous unit that is associated with a negative impact on quality of life, causing anxiety, depression, and poor self-esteem. The treatment of acne is not simple and presents some new challenges. This article addresses important issues faced by dermatologists on their daily, some of them specific for Latin America.

objectiveTo discuss daily practice recommendations when managing acne patients.

methodsA literature review was conducted by a group of eight experts with extensive experience in the field of acne. The results of the data review were presented at an initial kick-off meeting to align the consensus topics. Two e-surveys using the Delphi methodology and an interim group webinar meeting were held.

resultsThe expert panel reached a consensus on all proposed key statements, providing scientific support to help dermatologists and healthcare providers make acne management decisions on topics that can be challenging in the everyday practice of dermatology, such as the characteristics of Generation Z or the importance of the maintenance phase of adult acne treatment.

conclusionThis article provides current recommendations for managing acne patients. The high level of agreement achieved based on the latest evidence supports the best acne therapeutic choices in both established topics and new important issues that have emerged in recent years, such as the impact of social media, Generation Z characteristics, and transgender male patient specifics.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisConsensusDelphi TechniqueDermatologic AgentsHumansLatin AmericaQuality of LifeDermatologic AgentsAcneHyperpigmentationIsotretinoinLatin AmericaThiamidol

Identifiers

PMID38402012
PMCPMC11074621
OpenAlexW4392095842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.