Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38401667›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in insect science2024

Developing attractants and repellents for ticks: promises and challenges.

Daniel G Lingeman, Kenneth L O'Dell, Zainulabeuddin Syed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in insect science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The BiteBarrier perimeter: A passive spatial device for tick control and bite prevention.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel G LingemanDepartment of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA.
Kenneth L O'DellDepartment of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA.
Zainulabeuddin SyedDepartment of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA. Electronic address: Zainulabeuddin.Syed@uky.edu.

Funding

Identifying novel tick attractants and repellents by exploiting their olfactory and eco-physiologyR21AI163886 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SYED, ZAINULABEUDDIN · 2021 to 2022
$379k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI163886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, some of the most effective tools to counter vector-borne diseases have been those directed against the vectors. Ticks are undergoing a population explosion as evidenced by the recent expansion of their distribution range. Tick control has traditionally relied heavily on pesticides. However, sustained use of acaricides is resulting in resistant tick populations. Multipronged management strategies that build and expand upon innovative control methods are sorely needed. Behavior-modifying chemicals, referred to as semiochemicals, such as pheromones and repellents, offer a first line of personal protection against ticks. We review the current understanding of tick semiochemicals, and how such understanding is leading to the identification of novel chemistries that are effective and safe.

Indexed as

Protective AgentsTick ControlAcaricidesAnimalsInsect RepellentsPheromonesTicksAcaricidesInsect RepellentsPheromonesProtective Agents

Identifiers

PMID38401667
PMCPMC11139562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.