Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38401399›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2024

Helical reconstruction, again.

Edward H Egelman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Helical reconstruction of amyloids in cryoSPARC.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Edward H EgelmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA. Electronic address: egelman@virginia.edu.

Funding

Cryo-EM of Helical Protein and Nucleoprotein Polymers at Near Atomic ResolutionR35GM122510 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI EDWARD H. EGELMAN · 2017 to 2026
$7.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many protein and nucleoprotein complexes exist as helical polymers. As a result, much effort has been invested in developing methods for using electron microscopy to determine the structure of these assemblies. With the revolution in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), it has now become routine to reach a near-atomic level of resolution for these structures, and it is the exception when this is not possible. However, the greatest challenge is frequently determining the correct symmetry. This review focuses on why this can be so difficult and the current absence of a better approach than trial-and-error.

Indexed as

Cryoelectron MicroscopyMicroscopy, Electron

Identifiers

PMID38401399
PMCPMC10923117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.