Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38401185›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2024

Characterization of degradation kinetics of additively manufactured PLGA under variable mechanical loading paradigms.

Anna N Smith, Joseph B Ulsh, Richa Gupta, My My Tang, Ana P Peredo, Tim D Teinturier, Rob L Mauck, Sarah Gullbrand, Michael W Hast

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna N SmithMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: annasmi@vet.upenn.edu.
Joseph B UlshMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: joeulsh@seas.upenn.edu.
Richa GuptaMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: ri.gupta316@gmail.com.
My My TangMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: mtanng9@gmail.com.
Ana P PeredoMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: anapperedo@gmail.com.
Tim D TeinturierMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rob L MauckMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: lemauck@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Sarah GullbrandMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: sgullb@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Michael W HastMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: hast@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · USGreater Pittsburgh Orthopaedic Associates · USOrthopaedic Center · USOrthopaedic Research · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
Short-term Training: students in health professional schoolsT35OD010919 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Lee Atchison · 2012 to 2026
$1.8M
Modifying fragility fracture healing using a gradient-based mechanotransduction fixation approachK25AR078383 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAST, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2021 to 2025
$608k
Tissue Engineered Total Disc Replacement in a Large Animal ModelI01RX002274 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAUCK, ROBERT L, SMITH, HARVEY E. · 2017 to 2025
–
NIAMS NIH HHS K25 AR078383NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619NIH HHS T35 OD010919RRD VA I01 RX002274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled degradation of biodegradable poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) trauma implants may increase interfragmentary loading which is known to accelerate fracture healing. Additive manufacturing allows us to tune the mechanical properties of PLGA scaffolds; however, little is known about this novel approach. The purpose of this study was to use in vitro and in vivo models to determine the degradative kinetics of additively manufactured test coupons fabricated with PLGA. We hypothesized that 1) increases in infill density would lead to improved initial mechanical properties, and 2) loss of mechanical properties would be constant as a function of time, regardless of implant design. Porous and solid test coupons were fabricated using 85:15 PLGA filament. Coupons were either incubated in serum or implanted subcutaneously in rats for up to 16 weeks. Samples were tested in tension, compression, torsion, and bending on a universal test frame. Variables of interest included, but were not limited to: stiffness, and ultimate force for each unique test. Infill density was the driving factor in test coupon mechanical properties, whereas differences in lattice architecture led to minimal changes. We observed moderate levels of degradation after 8 weeks, and significant decreases for all specimens after 16 weeks. Results from this study suggest substantial degradation of 3-D printed PLGA implants occurs during the 8- to 16-week window, which may be desirable for bone fracture repair applications. This study represents initial findings that will help us better understand the complicated interactions between overall implant design, porosity, and implant biodegradation.

Indexed as

GlycolsMechanical PhenomenaAbsorbable ImplantsAnimalsPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerPorosityRatsGlycolsPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerAdditive manufacturingBiomaterialsBiomechanicsDegradationPLGATrauma implants

Identifiers

PMID38401185
PMCPMC11050744
OpenAlexW4392077409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.