Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38401171›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

What Is (Un)Flavored? A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization of Flavored Cigarillos.

Stephanie Pike Moore, Catherine Osborn, Jessica Suratkal, Pranav Vasu, Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Erika Trapl

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review investigating policy design and implementation of US state and local policy to restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie Pike MooreDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6301-9185
Catherine OsbornDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6162-7315
Jessica SuratkalDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Pranav VasuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sarah Koopman GonzalezDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7632-8075
Erika TraplDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Impact of Flavor on Youth & Young Adults use Intention, Abuse Liability and Perceptions of CigarillosR01DA048529 · NIDA · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, ELIZABETH G, QUISENBERRY, AMANDA J · 2019 to 2021
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048529NIH HHS R01DA048529U.S. Food and Drug Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo identify how flavor is conceptualized with respect to cigarillos to illuminate areas of concordance and discordance and provide a pathway for the harmonization of tobacco flavor measurement. AIMS AND

methodsThree methods were used to identify research measuring flavors respective to cigarillo products including: (1) querying research databases using key words "cigarillo," "tobacco" and "flavor"/'flavour,' (2) sub-sampling of the eligible literature with backward and forward reference searching, and (3) a bibliographic search of key experts. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Inclusion criteria required manuscripts to be available in English, published prior to 3/1/2022, be original and peer-reviewed, and include a measure of flavor pertaining to cigarillo products. A total of 163 manuscripts met these criteria and were subsequently evaluated.

resultsCigarillo flavor determinations were made based on the presence of flavoring agents, sensory characteristics, marketing or package characteristics, pre-defined lists, the absence of any of these, and/or were undefined. Individual flavors and their related classifications were not altogether mutually exclusive due to differences in conceptualization which has evolved over time.

conclusionsFlavor measures continue to evolve, likely in response to both tobacco control policies and industry shifts. There is a lack of standardization in flavor conceptualization that can be ameliorated through intentional integration of multiple forms of research such as identifying patterns of flavoring agents and/or marketing strategies that elicit a specific flavor profile. By doing this, we may more comprehensively evaluate the impact of flavors, their constituents, and related marketing strategies on broader population health. IMPLICATIONS: There are discrepancies in the conceptualization of flavor in tobacco and nicotine products. The lack of standardized, definitive language limits our ability to comprehensively evaluate the population-level health impact of flavors in addition to our ability to effectively inform, implement, and enforce policies restricting flavors in tobacco and nicotine products.

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsTobacco ProductsHumansTasteFlavoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID38401171
PMCPMC11339174
OpenAlexW4392183608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.