Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38401135›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

The date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: A combined fMRI and eye-tracking study.

Kristof Keidel, Rebekka Schröder, Peter Trautner, Alexander Radbruch, Carsten Murawski, Ulrich Ettinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Framing as a mechanism to overcome the temptation of bad habits.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristof KeidelDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1561-0157
Rebekka SchröderDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-4484
Peter TrautnerCore Facility Human 3T MRI, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander RadbruchClinic of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Carsten MurawskiDepartment of Finance, Centre for Brain, Mind and Markets, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Ulrich EttingerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DEThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal discounting, the tendency to devalue future rewards as a function of delay until receipt, is influenced by time framing. Specifically, discount rates are shallower when the time at which the reward is received is presented as a date (date condition; e.g., June 8, 2023) rather than in delay units (delay condition; e.g., 30 days), which is commonly referred to as the date/delay effect. However, the cognitive and neural mechanisms of this effect are not well understood. Here, we examined the date/delay effect by analysing combined fMRI and eye-tracking data of N = 31 participants completing a temporal discounting task in both a delay and a date condition. The results confirmed the date/delay effect and revealed that the date condition led to higher fixation durations on time attributes and to higher activity in precuneus/PCC and angular gyrus, that is, areas previously associated with episodic thinking. Additionally, participants made more comparative eye movements in the date compared to the delay condition. A lower date/delay effect was associated with higher prefrontal activity in the date > delay contrast, suggesting that higher control or arithmetic operations may reduce the date/delay effect. Our findings are in line with hypotheses positing that the date condition is associated with differential time estimation and the use of more comparative as opposed to integrative choice strategies. Specifically, higher activity in memory-related brain areas suggests that the date condition leads to higher perceived proximity of delayed rewards, while higher frontal activity (middle/superior frontal gyrus, posterior medial frontal cortex, cingulate) in participants with a lower date/delay effect suggests that the effect is particularly pronounced in participants avoiding complex arithmetic operations in the date condition.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDelay DiscountingEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewarddate/delay effectepisodic thinkingeye-trackingfMRIprecuneustemporal discounting

Identifiers

PMID38401135
PMCPMC10893971
OpenAlexW4392129960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.