ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Single-arm prospective study comparing ablation zone volume between time zero and 24 h after microwave ablation of liver tumors.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- TACE combined with DynaCT-guided MWA in the treatment of high-risk location liver cancers with ≤5 cm tumor size.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Retrospective evaluation of a novel ultrasound-based imaging analysis software for predicting radiofrequency ablation areas.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predicting liver ablation volumes with real-time MRI thermometry.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePercutaneous thermal ablation is an effective treatment for primary and metastatic liver tumors and is a recommended local therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Reported evidence shows an increase in the ablation zone volume over the first 24-h post-liver ablation. This report compares ablation zone volumes immediately at the completion (T = 0) of 26 microwave ablations of liver tumors to 24-h post-procedure (T = 24) volumes. MATERIALS AND
methods20 patients, 13 (65%) males, underwent a total of 26 hepatic microwave ablations (MWA) under ultrasound guidance. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) or MRI was performed immediately and another CECT 24 h post operatively. Evaluation of the ablation zone and comparison of the two post-operative scans were done using BioTrace software. The expansion of ablation zones on post-op CECTs was matched point by point per direction. The distance between each 2 points was measured and grouped by distance. The incidence of each specific distance was then converted into a percentage, first for each case separately, then for all cases altogether. Data were tested by a matched paired one-sided t test.
resultsThe median lesion diameter was 1.5 cm (range 0.5-3.3) with 16 (62%) HCC cases and 9 hepatic metastases (4 neuroendocrine carcinoma, 4 colorectal carcinomas, 1 breast carcinoma, 1 pancreatic cancer). The data show a consistent volume expansion greater than 30% (p = 7.7e-5) 24-h post-ablation, where the median expansion is 57%. Distances between T = 0 and T = 24 equal to 3-7 mm occur in over 35% of the cases.
conclusionThe ablation zone expansion at 24-h post-op was not uniform. The final ablation zone is difficult to predict at the time of the procedure. The awareness of the ablation zone expansion is important when treating near-critical structures, managing the heat sink effect, and preserving liver parenchyma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.