ArticleNeuroradiology2024
Whole-tumor histogram analysis of postcontrast T1-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient in predicting the grade and proliferative activity of adult intracranial ependymomas.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between histogram parameters of T2 weighted MRI data, WHO grade, tumor proliferation index and selected molecular markers in low-grade glioma.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Noninvasive prediction of Ki-67 expression level in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma using MRI histogram analysis: comparison and combination of MRI morphological features.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the value of histogram analysis of postcontrast T1-weighted (T1C) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images in predicting the grade and proliferative activity of adult intracranial ependymomas.
methodsForty-seven adult intracranial ependymomas were enrolled and underwent histogram parameters extraction (including minimum, maximum, mean, 1st percentile (Perc.01), Perc.05, Perc.10, Perc.25, Perc.50, Perc.75, Perc.90, Perc.95, Perc.99, standard deviation (SD), variance, coefficient of variation (CV), skewness, kurtosis, and entropy of T1C and ADC) using FireVoxel software. Differences in histogram parameters between grade 2 and grade 3 adult intracranial ependymomas were compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between histogram parameters and Ki-67 proliferation index.
resultsGrade 3 intracranial ependymomas group showed significantly higher Perc.95, Perc.99, SD, variance, CV, and entropy of T1C; lower minimum, mean, Perc.01, Perc.05, Perc.10, Perc.25, Perc.50 of ADC; and higher CV and entropy of ADC than grade 2 intracranial ependymomas group (all p < 0.05). Entropy (T1C) and Perc.10 (ADC) had a higher diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.805 and 0.827 among the histogram parameters of T1C and ADC, respectively. The diagnostic performance was improved by combining entropy (T1C) and Perc.10 (ADC), with an AUC of 0.857. Significant correlations were observed between significant histogram parameters of T1C (r = 0.296-0.417, p = 0.001-0.044) and ADC (r = -0.428-0.395, p = 0.003-0.038).
conclusionWhole-tumor histogram analysis of T1C and ADC may be a promising approach for predicting the grade and proliferative activity of adult intracranial ependymomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.