Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Continuous timely monitoring of core temperature with two wearable devices in pediatric patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer - a comparison study.
Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04914702 (Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs With Different Wearable Devices in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Cancer - a Comparison and Feasibility Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs With Different Wearable Devices in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Cancer - a Comparison and Feasibility Pilot Study
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous Temperature Monitoring via Wearable Devices for Fever or Infection Management in Acute Care Hospitals: Scoping Review of Clinical Implementation and Data Analytics.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Article
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Devices in Pediatric Clinical Care: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multimodal Noninvasive Assessment of C-Reactive Protein for Systemic Inflammation in Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Scoping review of the utilization of wearable devices in pediatric and young adult oncology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Wearable biosensors for pediatric hospitals: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Vital signs continuously monitored by two wearable devices in pediatric oncology patients, NCT04914702.Scientific data · 2025Observational
- Comparison of Wireless Continuous Axillary and Core Temperature Measurement after Major Surgery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePediatric patients with cancer often develop chemotherapy-induced fever in neutropenia (FN), requiring emergency broad-spectrum antibiotics. Continuous temperature monitoring can lead to earlier FN detection and therapy with improved outcomes. We aimed to compare the feasibility of continuous core temperature monitoring with timely data availability between two wearable devices (WDs) in pediatric oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy.
methodsIn this prospective observational two-center study, 20 patients (median age: 8 years) undergoing chemotherapy simultaneously wore two WDs (CORE®, Everion®) for 14 days. The predefined goal was core temperature recorded in sufficient quality and available within ≤ 30 min during ≥ 18/24 h for ≥ 7/14 days in more than 15 patients.
resultsMore patients reached the goal with CORE® (n = 13) versus Everion® (n = 3) (difference, 50% p < 0.001). After correcting for the transmission bottleneck caused by two WDs transmitting via one gateway, these numbers increased (n = 15 versus n = 14; difference, 5%; p = 0.69). CORE® measurements corresponded better to ear temperatures (n = 528; mean bias, - 0.07 °C; mean absolute difference, 0.35 °C) than Everion® measurements (n = 532; - 1.06 °C; 1.10 °C). Acceptance rates for the WDs were 95% for CORE® and 89% for Everion®.
conclusionThe CORE® fulfilled the predefined feasibility criterion (15 of 20 patients) after correction for transmission bottleneck, and the Everion® nearly fulfilled it. Continuous core temperature recording of good quality and with timely data availability was feasible from preschool to adolescent patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. These results encourage the design of randomized controlled trials on continuously monitored core temperature in pediatric patients.
trial registrationCLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04914702) on June 7, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.