Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400828›Full record

ArticleCancer2024

Reappraisal of prognostic factors used in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group RMS 2005 study for localized rhabdomyosarcoma to optimize risk stratification and generate a prognostic nomogram.

Gian Luca De Salvo, Paola Del Bianco, Veronique Minard-Colin, Julia Chisholm, Meriel Jenney, Gabriela Guillen, Christine Devalck, Rick Van Rijn, Janet Shipley, Daniel Orbach and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unraveling risk factors for multiple debridements in postoperative spinal infections: insights from a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Gian Luca De SalvoClinical Research Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-8476
Paola Del BiancoClinical Research Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6597-0265
Veronique Minard-ColinDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 1015, Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Julia ChisholmChildren and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UK.
Meriel JenneyDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Gabriela GuillenPediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Christine DevalckHôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Rick Van RijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Janet ShipleySarcoma Molecular Pathology Team, Divisions of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Daniel OrbachSIREDO Oncology Center, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-139X
Anna KelseyDepartment of Pediatric Histopathology, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Timothy RogersDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Florent GuerinDepartment of Pediatric Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Bicětre, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-3745
Giovanni ScarzelloRadiotherapy Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Andrea FerrariPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-0517
Maja Cesen MazicUniversity of Ljubljana Clinic of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Johannes H M MerksPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Gianni BisognoDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4462-5523
European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group

Funding

Association Léon Berard Enfant CancéreuxCancer Research UKFondazione Città della SperanzaKickCancer FoundationKoning Boudewijnstichting
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate the role of clinical factors together with FOXO1 fusion status in patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) to develop a predictive model for event-free survival and provide a rationale for risk stratification in future trials.

methodsThe authors used data from patients enrolled in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 study (EpSSG RMS 2005; EudraCT number 2005-000217-35). The following baseline variables were considered for the multivariable model: age at diagnosis, sex, histology, primary tumor site, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies group, tumor size, nodal status, and FOXO1 fusion status. Main effects and significant second-order interactions of candidate predictors were included in a multiple Cox proportional hazards regression model. A nomogram was generated for predicting 5-year event-free survival (EFS) probabilities.

resultsThe EFS and overall survival rates at 5 years were 70.9% (95% confidence interval, 68.6%-73.1%) and 81.0% (95% confidence interval, 78.9%-82.8%), respectively. The multivariable model retained five prognostic factors, including age at diagnosis interacting with tumor size, tumor primary site, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies clinical group, and FOXO1 fusion status. Based on each patient's total score in the nomogram, patients were stratified into four groups. The 5-year EFS rates were 94.1%, 78.4%, 65.2%, and 52.1% in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very-high-risk groups, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 97.2%, 91.5%, 74.3%, and 60.8%, respectively.

conclusionsThe results presented here provide the rationale to modify the EpSSG stratification, with the most significant change represented by the replacement of histology with fusion status. This classification was adopted in the new international trial launched by the EpSSG.

Indexed as

NomogramsRhabdomyosarcomaAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEuropeFemaleForkhead Box Protein O1HumansInfantMaleOncogene Proteins, FusionPrognosisRisk AssessmentForkhead Box Protein O1FOXO1 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionFOXO1 protein, humannomogramspediatricsproportional hazards modelsrhabdomyosarcomasurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID38400828
PMCPMC11497283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.