ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2024
Tree-informed Bayesian multi-source domain adaptation: cross-population probabilistic cause-of-death assignment using verbal autopsy.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical latent class models for mortality surveillance using partially verified verbal autopsies.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026Article
- Country-specific estimates of misclassification rates of computer-coded verbal autopsy algorithms.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Bayesian Tensor Decomposition for Clustering Latent Symptom Profiles for Verbal Autopsy Data.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Accounting for uncertainty in conflict mortality estimation: an application to the Gaza War in 2023-2024.Population health metrics · 2025Article
- Bayesian Transfer Learning.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2025Article
- BAYESIAN NESTED LATENT CLASS MODELS FOR CAUSE-OF-DEATH ASSIGNMENT USING VERBAL AUTOPSIES ACROSS MULTIPLE DOMAINS.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- The openVA Toolkit for Verbal Autopsies.The R journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining causes of deaths (CODs) occurred outside of civil registration and vital statistics systems is challenging. A technique called verbal autopsy (VA) is widely adopted to gather information on deaths in practice. A VA consists of interviewing relatives of a deceased person about symptoms of the deceased in the period leading to the death, often resulting in multivariate binary responses. While statistical methods have been devised for estimating the cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) for a study population, continued expansion of VA to new populations (or "domains") necessitates approaches that recognize between-domain differences while capitalizing on potential similarities. In this article, we propose such a domain-adaptive method that integrates external between-domain similarity information encoded by a prespecified rooted weighted tree. Given a cause, we use latent class models to characterize the conditional distributions of the responses that may vary by domain. We specify a logistic stick-breaking Gaussian diffusion process prior along the tree for class mixing weights with node-specific spike-and-slab priors to pool information between the domains in a data-driven way. The posterior inference is conducted via a scalable variational Bayes algorithm. Simulation studies show that the domain adaptation enabled by the proposed method improves CSMF estimation and individual COD assignment. We also illustrate and evaluate the method using a validation dataset. The article concludes with a discussion of limitations and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.