Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400744›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Identifying the capabilities for creating next-generation registries: a guide for data leaders and a case for "registry science".

Steven E Labkoff, Yuri Quintana, Leon Rozenblit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Association of Long COVID and CKD: Findings from the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven E LabkoffDepartment of Clinical and Healthcare Informatics, Quantori, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-5185
Yuri QuintanaDivision of Clinical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-0257
Leon RozenblitDivision of Clinical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe increasing demands for curated, high-quality research data are driving the emergence of a novel registry type. The need to assemble, curate, and export this data grows, and the conventional simplicity of registry models is driving the need for advanced, multimodal data registries-the dawn of the next-generation registry. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe article provides an outline of the technology roles and responsibilities needed for successful implementations of next-generation registries.

resultsWe propose a framework for the planning, construction, maintenance, and sustainability of this new registry type. DISCUSSION: A rubric of organizational, computational, and human resource needs is discussed in detail, backed by over 40 years of combined in-the-field experiences by the authors.

conclusionsA novel field, registry science, within the clinical research informatics domain, has arisen to offer its insights into conceiving, structuring, and sustaining this new breed of tools.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyHumansRegistriesclinical researchcomputer data processingprogramregistriesregistry sciencesustainability

Identifiers

PMID38400744
PMCPMC10990529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.