ArticleCancer medicine2024
Dismal outcome of refractory or relapsing patients with myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia partially alleviated by intensive chemotherapy.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) with myelodysplasia-related characteristics is a heterogeneous subset of AML that has been challenged throughout the history of myeloid malignancies classifications, considered to have similar outcomes as intermediate- or adverse-risk AML depending on the subgroup. However, little is known about the fate of these patients in refractory or relapsed situation (R/R) after first line therapy.
methodsA large series of R/R AML patients, recorded in the French DATAML registry, have received either intensive chemotherapy (ICT), azacitidine (AZA) as single agent, or best supportive care (BSC). A cohort of 183 patients (median age 63-year-old) with what was called at the time AML-MRC has been explored, and data are reported here.
resultsPatient status was refractory for 93, while 90 had relapsed. Respectively, 88, 34, and 61 were included in the three treatment arms. The median OS of the whole cohort was 4.2 months (95%CI: 3.1-5.6) with a mean 1-year overall survival of 24% ± 3.2%. There was no significant survival difference between refractory and relapsed patients. The BSC group had overall a significantly worse outcome (p = 0.0001), and this remained true in both refractory (p = 0.01) and relapsed (p = 0.002) patients. Similar survivals were observed in both groups comparing ICT and AZA.
conclusionsThese data, reporting about an ill-explored population, indicate the poor prognosis of this condition where both ICT and AZA can be proposed. The latter, which was demonstrated here to be a feasible option, should be added to new targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.