ArticleCancer medicine2024
Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of Stage I lung adenocarcinoma containing micropapillary components.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of high-risk factor in early-stage lung cancer: micropapillary adenocarcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing the intraoperative identification of high-grade patterns in invasive lung adenocarcinoma via radiomics.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Risk Stratification and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma: The Unmet Needs.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of Stage I lung adenocarcinoma containing micropapillary components.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe usefulness of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary (MIP) components remains unclear. We analyzed whether postoperative ACT could reduce recurrence in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma with MIP components, thereby improving their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
methodsData for patients with pathologically confirmed stage I lung adenocarcinoma with MIP components from January 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. OS and DFS were analyzed in groups and subgroups.
resultsOverall, 259 patients were enrolled. Patients who received ACT in stage IA showed significantly better survival than did those with no-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT); (5-year OS 89.4% vs. 73.6%, p < 0.001; 5-year DFS 87.2% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.008). A difference was also observed for in-stage IB patients (5-year OS 82.0% vs. 51.8%, p = 0.001; 5-year DFS 76.0% vs. 41.11 %, p = 0.004). In subgroup analysis based on the proportion of MIP components, patients with 1%-5% MIP components had a significantly better prognosis in the ACT group than in the NACT group (5-year OS 82.4% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.005; 5-year DFS 76.5% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.032). A similar difference was observed for patients with MIP ≥5% (5-year OS 80.7% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.009; 5-year DFS 73.11% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.007).
conclusionAmong patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma with MIP components, those who received ACT showed significant survival benefits compared to those without ACT. Patients with lung adenocarcinoma with MIP components could benefit from ACT when the MIP was ≥1%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.