ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Identifying High-Cost, High-Need Patients in a Network of Community Hospitals.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Care Coordination for High-Need, High-Cost Commercially Insured Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- "Majority of the time, I know I'm right": understanding the decisions behind persistently high ED utilization among patients with substance use disorders.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined healthcare costs at HonorHealth, a community-based academic health center comprised of 5 hospitals and numerous ambulatory care facilities. Patient encounters that resulted in admission in 2019 were included in the study. Mean costs in 2019 for high costs and high needs (HCHN) patients were compared with all remaining patients using a framework developed by the National Academy of Medicine. HCHN patients were older (71 vs 52 years), with a lower percentage of females (41.7% vs 59.8%), more frequently White (90.1% vs 87.5%), less frequently married (52.4% vs 54.5%), with a longer length of stay (6.5 vs 3.0 days) and higher mean charges ($134 743 vs $16 414). The mean cost per patient in the HCHN group decreased by age group ($192, 963, $165 200, $144 584, $134 795, and $108 356) for 0 to 18, 19 to 44, 45 to 64, 65 to 84, and 85+ years, respectively. HCHN patients were more publicly insured (49% vs 38%). Targeted interventions to treat HCHN may lead to lower healthcare costs and improved health outcomes within this system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.