Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400491›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Anomaly Detection Methods in Autonomous Robotic Missions.

Shivoh Chirayil Nandakumar, Daniel Mitchell, Mustafa Suphi Erden, David Flynn, Theodore Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shivoh Chirayil NandakumarSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6686-0586
Daniel MitchellJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-4150
Mustafa Suphi ErdenSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK.
David FlynnJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1024-3618
Theodore LimSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK.

Funding

Heriot Watt University Edinburgh James Watt PhD Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2015, there has been an increase in articles on anomaly detection in robotic systems, reflecting its growing importance in improving the robustness and reliability of the increasingly utilized autonomous robots. This review paper investigates the literature on the detection of anomalies in Autonomous Robotic Missions (ARMs). It reveals different perspectives on anomaly and juxtaposition to fault detection. To reach a consensus, we infer a unified understanding of anomalies that encapsulate their various characteristics observed in ARMs and propose a classification of anomalies in terms of spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal elements based on their fundamental features. Further, the paper discusses the implications of the proposed unified understanding and classification in ARMs and provides future directions. We envisage a study surrounding the specific use of the term anomaly, and methods for their detection could contribute to and accelerate the research and development of a universal anomaly detection system for ARMs.

Indexed as

anomalyautonomous missionsautonomous robots

Identifiers

PMID38400491
PMCPMC10892279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.