ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Blind Calibration of Environmental Acoustics Measurements Using Smartphones.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distributed Sensor Network Calibration Under Sensor Nonlinearities with Applications in Aerodynamic Pressure Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sequential Clustering Phases for Environmental Noise Level Monitoring on a Mobile Crowd Sourcing/Sensing Platform.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental noise control is a major health and social issue. Numerous environmental policies require local authorities to draw up noise maps to establish an inventory of the noise environment and then propose action plans to improve its quality. In general, these maps are produced using numerical simulations, which may not be sufficiently representative, for example, concerning the temporal dynamics of noise levels. Acoustic sensor measurements are also insufficient in terms of spatial coverage. More recently, an alternative approach has been proposed, consisting of using citizens as data producers by using smartphones as tools of geo-localized acoustic measurement. However, a lack of calibration of smartphones can generate a significant bias in the results obtained. Against the classical metrological principle that would aim to calibrate any sensor beforehand for physical measurement, some have proposed mass calibration procedures called "blind calibration". The method is based on the crossing of sensors in the same area at the same time, which are therefore supposed to observe the same phenomenon (i.e., measure the same value). The multiple crossings of a large number of sensors at the scale of a territory and the analysis of the relationships between sensors allow for the calibration of the set of sensors. In this article, we propose to adapt a blind calibration method to data from the NoiseCapture smartphone application. The method's behavior is then tested on NoiseCapture datasets for which information on the calibration values of some smartphones is already available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.