Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400405›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Dense Out-of-Distribution Detection by Robust Learning on Synthetic Negative Data.

Matej Grcić, Petra Bevandić, Zoran Kalafatić, Siniša Šegvić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Likelihood Ratio-Based Approach to Segmenting Unknown Objects.International journal of computer vision · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matej GrcićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8379-6686
Petra BevandićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-0624
Zoran KalafatićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8918-9070
Siniša ŠegvićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-7378-0536

Funding

Croatian Science Foundation IP-2020-02-5851 ADEPTEuropean Regional Development Fund KK.01.1.1.01.0009 DATACROSSEuropean Regional Development Fund KK.01.2.1.02.0119 A-Unit
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard machine learning is unable to accommodate inputs which do not belong to the training distribution. The resulting models often give rise to confident incorrect predictions which may lead to devastating consequences. This problem is especially demanding in the context of dense prediction since input images may be only partially anomalous. Previous work has addressed dense out-of-distribution detection by discriminative training with respect to off-the-shelf negative datasets. However, real negative data may lead to over-optimistic evaluation due to possible overlap with test anomalies. To this end, we extend this approach by generating synthetic negative patches along the border of the inlier manifold. We leverage a jointly trained normalizing flow due to a coverage-oriented learning objective and the capability to generate samples at different resolutions. We detect anomalies according to a principled information-theoretic criterion which can be consistently applied through training and inference. The resulting models set the new state of the art on benchmarks for out-of-distribution detection in road-driving scenes and remote sensing imagery despite minimal computational overhead.

Indexed as

autonomous drivingdense out-of-distribution detectionnormalizing flowsremote sensingsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38400405
PMCPMC10892056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.