Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400381›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Changes in the Activity of the Erector Spinae and Gluteus Medius Muscles with the Presence of Simulated Lower Limb Dysmetria.

María Benito de Pedro, Ana Isabel Benito de Pedro, Ángela Aguilera Rubio, Jose Luis Maté Muñoz, Juan Hernández Lougedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María Benito de PedroDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health HM, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3592-0056
Ana Isabel Benito de PedroDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health HM, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain.
Ángela Aguilera RubioDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health HM, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6394-7037
Jose Luis Maté MuñozDepartment of Radiology, Rehabiilitation and Physiotherapy, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-1455
Juan Hernández LougedoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health HM, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3302-4346

Funding

Camilo José Cela University DRYPEL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Leg length discrepancy (LLD), regardless of its origin, is a very common pathology that can contribute to low back pain. Various authors have pointed out its relationship with the lack of activation of both the gluteus medius (GM) and the ipsilateral erector spinae (ES). The purpose of this study was to identify the activation of the ES and GM with different simulated LLDs, correlating this activation with LBP. In turn, we evaluated whether ES and GM activity has an effect on jumping ability using a CMJ test. (2) Method: A sample of healthy subjects was selected to whom an artificial LLD was applied using 0.5, 1, and 1.5 cm insoles. These three heights were measured using EMG while the subjects walked and performed a counter movement jump (CMJ). The measurements of the insole heights were carried out in random order using a Latin square. Muscle activation patterns were recorded for 30 s at each of the insole heights while the patients walked at 5.7 km/h and they were compared with the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), both on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides. These muscles were then measured under the same circumstances during the performance of the CMJ. (3) Results: We found statistically significant differences in the flight heights in both the CMJ and DJ. In the comparison, significant differences were found in the flight heights of the CMJ and the DJ using the 5 mm insoles, and in the case of the DJ, also without insoles, with respect to the MVC. We found statistically significant differences in the activation of the GM with the differences in insoles, but not in the activation of the Es in relation to the different insole heights. (4) Conclusions: Insoles of different heights caused activation differences in the medius on the side where the insoles were placed. We can relate this difference in activation to LBP. In relation to the ES, no significant differences were found in the activation of the ipsilateral side of the insole.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaButtocksElectromyographyHumansMuscle, SkeletalThighCMJelectromyographyerector spinaegluteus mediusleg length discrepancylow back pain

Identifiers

PMID38400381
PMCPMC10892151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.