Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400330›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Respiratory Diseases Diagnosis Using Audio Analysis and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.

Panagiotis Kapetanidis, Fotios Kalioras, Constantinos Tsakonas, Pantelis Tzamalis, George Kontogiannis, Theodora Karamanidou, Thanos G Stavropoulos, Sotiris Nikoletseas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Panagiotis KapetanidisComputer Engineering and Informatics Department, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Fotios KaliorasComputer Engineering and Informatics Department, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Constantinos TsakonasComputer Engineering and Informatics Department, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7016-7533
Pantelis TzamalisComputer Engineering and Informatics Department, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0238-8243
George KontogiannisComputer Engineering and Informatics Department, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Theodora KaramanidouPfizer Center for Digital Innovation, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9766-983X
Thanos G StavropoulosPfizer Center for Digital Innovation, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2389-4329
Sotiris NikoletseasComputer Engineering and Informatics Department, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3765-5636

Funding

Pfizer Hellas SA 82660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory diseases represent a significant global burden, necessitating efficient diagnostic methods for timely intervention. Digital biomarkers based on audio, acoustics, and sound from the upper and lower respiratory system, as well as the voice, have emerged as valuable indicators of respiratory functionality. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) algorithms offer promising avenues for the identification and diagnosis of respiratory diseases through the analysis and processing of such audio-based biomarkers. An ever-increasing number of studies employ ML techniques to extract meaningful information from audio biomarkers. Beyond disease identification, these studies explore diverse aspects such as the recognition of cough sounds amidst environmental noise, the analysis of respiratory sounds to detect respiratory symptoms like wheezes and crackles, as well as the analysis of the voice/speech for the evaluation of human voice abnormalities. To provide a more in-depth analysis, this review examines 75 relevant audio analysis studies across three distinct areas of concern based on respiratory diseases' symptoms: (a) cough detection, (b) lower respiratory symptoms identification, and (c) diagnostics from the voice and speech. Furthermore, publicly available datasets commonly utilized in this domain are presented. It is observed that research trends are influenced by the pandemic, with a surge in studies on COVID-19 diagnosis, mobile data acquisition, and remote diagnosis systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19AlgorithmsCoughHumansMachine LearningRespiratory SoundsRespiratory Tract DiseasesSARS-CoV-2Voiceaudio analysisaudio-based biomarkersdigital biomarkersmachine learningrespiratory diseaserespiratory symptomssignal processingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38400330
PMCPMC10893010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.