Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400281›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Gait Characterization in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) Using a Single-Sensor Accelerometer: Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches.

Albara Ah Ramli, Xin Liu, Kelly Berndt, Erica Goude, Jiahui Hou, Lynea B Kaethler, Rex Liu, Amanda Lopez, Alina Nicorici, Corey Owens and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Wearable sensors in paediatric neurology.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Human Pose Estimation for Clinical Analysis of Gait Pathologies.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Albara Ah RamliDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4617-225X
Xin LiuDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Kelly BerndtDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Erica GoudeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Jiahui HouDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Lynea B KaethlerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Rex LiuDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Amanda LopezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Alina NicoriciDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Corey OwensUC Davis Center for Health and Technology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
David RodriguezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Jane WangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Huanle ZhangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Daniel ArankiBerkeley School of Information, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-422X
Craig M McDonaldDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Erik K HenricsonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-6441

Funding

Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society NoneMuscular Dystrophy Association 646805United States Department of Defense W81XWH-17-1-0477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in gait patterns of children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and typically developing (TD) peers are visible to the eye, but quantifications of those differences outside of the gait laboratory have been elusive. In this work, we measured vertical, mediolateral, and anteroposterior acceleration using a waist-worn iPhone accelerometer during ambulation across a typical range of velocities. Fifteen TD and fifteen DMD children from 3 to 16 years of age underwent eight walking/running activities, including five 25 m walk/run speed-calibration tests at a slow walk to running speeds (SC-L1 to SC-L5), a 6-min walk test (6MWT), a 100 m fast walk/jog/run (100MRW), and a free walk (FW). For clinical anchoring purposes, participants completed a Northstar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA). We extracted temporospatial gait clinical features (CFs) and applied multiple machine learning (ML) approaches to differentiate between DMD and TD children using extracted temporospatial gait CFs and raw data. Extracted temporospatial gait CFs showed reduced step length and a greater mediolateral component of total power (TP) consistent with shorter strides and Trendelenberg-like gait commonly observed in DMD. ML approaches using temporospatial gait CFs and raw data varied in effectiveness at differentiating between DMD and TD controls at different speeds, with an accuracy of up to 100%. We demonstrate that by using ML with accelerometer data from a consumer-grade smartphone, we can capture DMD-associated gait characteristics in toddlers to teens.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneAccelerometryAdolescentGaitHumansWalkingaccelerometerclassical machine learningdeep learningduchenne muscular dystrophygaitgait cyclelinear discriminant analysisprincipal components analysissensorstemporospatial gait clinical featurestypically developing

Identifiers

PMID38400281
PMCPMC10892016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.