Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400225›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Study on the Influence of Label Image Accuracy on the Performance of Concrete Crack Segmentation Network Models.

Kaifeng Ma, Mengshu Hao, Wenlong Shang, Jinping Liu, Junzhen Meng, Qingfeng Hu, Peipei He, Shiming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaifeng MaCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Mengshu HaoCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Wenlong ShangCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Jinping LiuCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-2876
Junzhen MengCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Qingfeng HuCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Peipei HeCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Shiming LiCollege of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9406-0535

Funding

China Henan Province Science and technology project 232102320068Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project 222102220035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A high-quality dataset is a basic requirement to ensure the training quality and prediction accuracy of a deep learning network model (DLNM). To explore the influence of label image accuracy on the performance of a concrete crack segmentation network model in a semantic segmentation dataset, this study uses three labelling strategies, namely pixel-level fine labelling, outer contour widening labelling and topological structure widening labelling, respectively, to generate crack label images and construct three sets of crack semantic segmentation datasets with different accuracy. Four semantic segmentation network models (SSNMs), U-Net, High-Resolution Net (HRNet)V2, Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet) and DeepLabV3+, were used for learning and training. The results show that the datasets constructed from the crack label images with pix-el-level fine labelling are more conducive to improving the accuracy of the network model for crack image segmentation. The U-Net had the best performance among the four SSNMs. The Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU), Mean Pixel Accuracy (MPA) and Accuracy reached 85.47%, 90.86% and 98.66%, respectively. The average difference between the quantized width of the crack image segmentation obtained by U-Net and the real crack width was 0.734 pixels, the maximum difference was 1.997 pixels, and the minimum difference was 0.141 pixels. Therefore, to improve the segmentation accuracy of crack images, the pixel-level fine labelling strategy and U-Net are the best choices.

Indexed as

accuracy evaluationconcrete crack segmentationDLNMlabel image accuracySSNM

Identifiers

PMID38400225
PMCPMC10892264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.