Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38400222›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Monitoring of Antarctica's Fragile Vegetation Using Drone-Based Remote Sensing, Multispectral Imagery and AI.

Damini Raniga, Narmilan Amarasingam, Juan Sandino, Ashray Doshi, Johan Barthelemy, Krystal Randall, Sharon A Robinson, Felipe Gonzalez, Barbara Bollard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Damini RanigaSchool of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City, QLD 4000, Australia.
Narmilan AmarasingamSchool of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-2680
Juan SandinoSchool of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6780-2425
Ashray DoshiSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Johan BarthelemySecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Krystal RandallSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Sharon A RobinsonSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7130-9617
Felipe GonzalezSchool of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-3682
Barbara BollardSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2103-8561
University of Wollongong · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council SR200100005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vegetation in East Antarctica, such as moss and lichen, vulnerable to the effects of climate change and ozone depletion, requires robust non-invasive methods to monitor its health condition. Despite the increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to acquire high-resolution data for vegetation analysis in Antarctic regions through artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, the use of multispectral imagery and deep learning (DL) is quite limited. This study addresses this gap with two pivotal contributions: (1) it underscores the potential of deep learning (DL) in a field with notably limited implementations for these datasets; and (2) it introduces an innovative workflow that compares the performance between two supervised machine learning (ML) classifiers: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and U-Net. The proposed workflow is validated by detecting and mapping moss and lichen using data collected in the highly biodiverse Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) 135, situated near Casey Station, between January and February 2023. The implemented ML models were trained against five classes: Healthy Moss, Stressed Moss, Moribund Moss, Lichen, and Non-vegetated. In the development of the U-Net model, two methods were applied: Method (1) which utilised the original labelled data as those used for XGBoost; and Method (2) which incorporated XGBoost predictions as additional input to that version of U-Net. Results indicate that XGBoost demonstrated robust performance, exceeding 85% in key metrics such as precision, recall, and F1-score. The workflow suggested enhanced accuracy in the classification outputs for U-Net, as Method 2 demonstrated a substantial increase in precision, recall and F1-score compared to Method 1, with notable improvements such as precision for Healthy Moss (Method 2: 94% vs. Method 1: 74%) and recall for Stressed Moss (Method 2: 86% vs. Method 1: 69%). These findings contribute to advancing non-invasive monitoring techniques for the delicate Antarctic ecosystems, showcasing the potential of UAVs, high-resolution multispectral imagery, and ML models in remote sensing applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRemote Sensing TechnologyAntarctic RegionsEcosystemUnmanned Aerial Devicesantarcticantarctic specially protected area (ASPA)convolutional neural networkgradient boostinglichenmachine learningmossunmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

Identifiers

PMID38400222
PMCPMC10892490
OpenAlexW4391562037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.