ArticlePolymers2024
Investigation of an Optimal Material Addition Rate for Energy Consumption and Dimensional Accuracy in Fused Filament Fabrication of CFR-PEEK.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The material addition rate (MAR) of fused filament fabrication (FFF) is an indicator of process efficiency varied by process parameter settings, which affects energy consumption and part quality in FFF. This study aims to identify the optimal MAR of FFF using carbon-fiber-reinforced polyether-ether-ketone (CFR-PEEK) by considering a trade-off between energy consumption and the dimensional accuracy of FFF outputs. A design of experiments considering two main process parameters is planned to print three sample types through FFF for CFR-PEEK. Then, the MAR (i.e., deposited material volume per build time) of FFF is obtained to derive individual regression models of energy consumption and the dimensional accuracy measured for each sample type. Furthermore, a trade-off between energy consumption and dimensional accuracy on the MAR is formulated to derive an optimal MAR for each sample type. The results show that FFF for CFR-PEEK has a trade-off between energy consumption and dimensional accuracy; there exists a specific MAR that maximizes the overall performance of energy consumption and dimensional accuracy for each sample type. The optimal MAR is the highest for the small volume sample, whereas it becomes the lowest for the vertical build orientation sample. This study suggests that the optimal MAR should be flexibly adjusted based on a fabricated part. The findings from this study also address the fact that decision-making for optimal FFF operations needs a transition from the identification of specific process parameter settings to the management of a proper process efficiency level in FFF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.