Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38399379›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Bioavailability of Oral Curcumin in Systematic Reviews: A Methodological Study.

Viljemka Bučević Popović, Esma Karahmet Farhat, Ines Banjari, Antonia Jeličić Kadić, Livia Puljak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pharmacological Insights and Technological Innovations inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Viljemka Bučević PopovićDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-9927-1107
Esma Karahmet FarhatDepartment of Food and Nutrition Research, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.
Ines BanjariDepartment of Food and Nutrition Research, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-5007
Antonia Jeličić KadićDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-960X
Livia PuljakCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-6061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curcumin is a natural compound found in turmeric that exhibits diverse biological activities. However, its poor bioavailability limits its therapeutic application, which has led to the development of various bioavailability-improved formulations. In this methodological study, we analyzed whether systematic reviews on curcumin considered the bioavailability of systemic oral curcumin formulations when synthesizing evidence from human clinical trials. A total of 171 systematic reviews published between 2003 and 2022 were included in the study. From the included studies, we extracted data on study characteristics; type of curcumin; methods; and reporting regarding bioavailability, funding, and conflict of interest. Our results show that systematic reviews rarely consider the variable bioavailability of tested curcumin formulations. Relevant statistical subgroup and/or sensitivity analyses were reported in the methods and results of only 3.5% and 6.4% of reviews, respectively. However, more reviews mentioned bioavailability in their discussion (57%) or conclusion (13%). The detailed analysis of the included systematic reviews suggests that there is broad recognition of product bioavailability as a crucial factor affecting the health effects of curcumin, which is not accompanied by adequate evidence synthesis. Therefore, the results of most systematic reviews on orally administered curcumin should be taken with caution.

Indexed as

bioavailabilitycurcuminnutraceuticalsystematic reviewturmeric

Identifiers

PMID38399379
PMCPMC10891944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.