Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38399329›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2024

Recent Developments in CaCO

Chenteng Lin, Muhammad Akhtar, Yingjie Li, Min Ji, Rongqin Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. EngineeringACS synthetic biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Investigating the Wound Healing Potential of CuCOBiological trace element research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Next Generation Calcium Nanomaterials: Disrupting Tumor CaInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Glioma Cell Membrane-Coated CaCOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Article
  10. The Immune Microenvironment in Liver Cancer: From Analysis to Targeting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chenteng LinSchool of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education), Huashan Hospital, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Muhammad AkhtarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1759-8224
Yingjie LiShanghai Yangpu District Mental Health Center, Shanghai 200090, China.
Min JiShanghai Yangpu District Mental Health Center, Shanghai 200090, China.
Rongqin HuangSchool of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education), Huashan Hospital, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium carbonate (CaCO

Indexed as

calcium carbonate (CaCO3)nano-drug delivery systemssynthesis methodstumor diagnosistumor treatment

Identifiers

PMID38399329
PMCPMC10893456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.