ReviewPharmaceutics2024
Harnessing the Potential of PLGA Nanoparticles for Enhanced Bone Regeneration.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface-Engineered Phytochemical Nanomedicines for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Skeletal Targeting, Imaging-Supported Evaluation, and Therapeutic Performance.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Bridging Scales: Integrating Hyaluronan-Based Nanoencapsulation into 3D Hydrogel Constructs for Advanced Therapeutics-A Comprehensive Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing Breast Cancer Treatment: Harnessing Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Model, Cancer Metabolism, and Nanotechnology-Enhanced Chemotherapy for Improved Patient Outcomes.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Recent Trends in the Development and Clinical Translation of Polymer-based Targeted Therapeutic Nanoparticle.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Novel Metformin-Encapsulating Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Microspheres in Calcium Phosphate Pulp-Capping Cement with Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Regenerative Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Synergistic integration of biomaterials in orthopedic implantation for infection preventing and tissue engineering.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- A smart nanocomposite bioactive ink for controlled siRNA delivery in calvarial mesenchymal stromal cells as a minimally invasive treatment for craniosynostosis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Strategies for Bone Regeneration: Smart Scaffolds and Multiscale Cues.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Functionalization of 3D printed PLGA-based scaffolds for bone regeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Novel Nanomaterials for Developing Bone Scaffolds and Tissue Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring the Potential of PLGA Nanoparticles for Enhancing Pulmonary Drug Delivery.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Advantages of nanoencapsulation in the delivery of therapeutics for bone regeneration.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Phytonanoparticles as novel drug carriers for enhanced osteogenesis and osseointegration.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Phytochemicals in Bone Therapy: Exploring Natural Alternatives for Bone Health.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Advances in biomaterials for osteonecrosis treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Polymers for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, nanotechnologies have become increasingly prominent in the field of bone tissue engineering (BTE), offering substantial potential to advance the field forward. These advancements manifest in two primary ways: the localized application of nanoengineered materials to enhance bone regeneration and their use as nanovehicles for delivering bioactive compounds. Despite significant progress in the development of bone substitutes over the past few decades, it is worth noting that the quest to identify the optimal biomaterial for bone regeneration remains a subject of intense debate. Ever since its initial discovery, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) has found widespread use in BTE due to its favorable biocompatibility and customizable biodegradability. This review provides an overview of contemporary advancements in the development of bone regeneration materials using PLGA polymers. The review covers some of the properties of PLGA, with a special focus on modifications of these properties towards bone regeneration. Furthermore, we delve into the techniques for synthesizing PLGA nanoparticles (NPs), the diverse forms in which these NPs can be fabricated, and the bioactive molecules that exhibit therapeutic potential for promoting bone regeneration. Additionally, we addressed some of the current concerns regarding the safety of PLGA NPs and PLGA-based products available on the market. Finally, we briefly discussed some of the current challenges and proposed some strategies to functionally enhance the fabrication of PLGA NPs towards BTE. We envisage that the utilization of PLGA NP holds significant potential as a potent tool in advancing therapies for intractable bone diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.