ArticleMicromachines2024
Understanding Melt Pool Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Post-Heat Treatment on the Mechanical and Residual Stress Behavior of Pulsed Wave S316L Fabricated by Directed Energy Deposition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Metal Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion Process Development Using Optical Tomography.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process, the quality of fabrications is intricately tied to the laser-matter interaction, specifically the formation of the melt pool. This study experimentally examined the intricacies of melt pool characteristics and surface topography across diverse laser powers and speeds via single-track laser scanning on a bare plate and powder bed for 316L stainless steel. The results reveal that the presence of a powder layer amplifies melt pool instability and worsens irregularities due to increased laser absorption and the introduction of uneven mass from the powder. To provide a comprehensive understanding of melt pool dynamics, a high-fidelity computational model encompassing fluid dynamics, heat transfer, vaporization, and solidification was developed. It was validated against the measured melt pool dimensions and morphology, effectively predicting conduction and keyholing modes with irregular surface features. Particularly, the model explained the forming mechanisms of a defective morphology, termed swell-undercut, at high power and speed conditions, detailing the roles of recoil pressure and liquid refilling. As an application, multiple-track simulations replicate the surface features on cubic samples under two distinct process conditions, showcasing the potential of the laser-matter interaction model for process optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.