Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398713›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

SENOSI Confocal Microscopy: A New and Innovating Way to Detect Positive Margins in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer?

Deborah Wernly, Charles Beniere, Valerie Besse, Stephanie Seidler, Regine Lachat, Igor Letovanec, Daniela Huber, Colin Simonson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current role of HistologPathologica · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah WernlyHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Charles BeniereHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1175-0267
Valerie BesseHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Stephanie SeidlerHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Regine LachatHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Igor LetovanecHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Daniela HuberHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9082-9749
Colin SimonsonHôpital du Valais, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-8765
Hôpital du Valais · CHAmgen (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Switzerland, breast cancer is the leading cancer among women, with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) being the preferred treatment for small tumors. The margin status post-surgery is a critical predictor of local recurrence. Achieving negative margins remains a challenge, leading to re-excision in 20-30% of cases. Traditional methods like intraoperative examination palpation and radiography have limitations in assessing excised margins. This study introduces the Histolog

Indexed as

breast cancerconfocal microscopymarginssurgery

Identifiers

PMID38398713
PMCPMC10890637
OpenAlexW4391385497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.