Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398585›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.

Qiqige Wuyun, Yihan Chen, Yifeng Shen, Yang Cao, Gang Hu, Wei Cui, Jianzhao Gao, Wei Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Protein Structure Prediction Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Qiqige WuyunDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Yihan ChenSchool of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
Yifeng ShenFaculty of Environment and Information Studies, Keio University, Fujisawa 252-0882, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yang CaoCollege of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Gang HuNITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
Wei CuiSchool of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-1330
Jianzhao GaoSchool of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-4786
Wei ZhengDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-9003
Nankai University · CNKeio University Shonan Fujisawa · JPMichigan State University · USSichuan University · CNUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81973243National Natural Science Foundation of China 92370128Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin 21JCYBJC00340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of three-dimensional (3D) protein structure from amino acid sequences has stood as a significant challenge in computational and structural bioinformatics for decades. Recently, the widespread integration of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms has substantially expedited advancements in protein structure prediction, yielding numerous significant milestones. In particular, the end-to-end deep learning method AlphaFold2 has facilitated the rise of structure prediction performance to new heights, regularly competitive with experimental structures in the 14th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP14). To provide a comprehensive understanding and guide future research in the field of protein structure prediction for researchers, this review describes various methodologies, assessments, and databases in protein structure prediction, including traditionally used protein structure prediction methods, such as template-based modeling (TBM) and template-free modeling (FM) approaches; recently developed deep learning-based methods, such as contact/distance-guided methods, end-to-end folding methods, and protein language model (PLM)-based methods; multi-domain protein structure prediction methods; the CASP experiments and related assessments; and the recently released AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AlphaFold DB). We discuss their advantages, disadvantages, and application scopes, aiming to provide researchers with insights through which to understand the limitations, contexts, and effective selections of protein structure prediction methods in protein-related fields.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceProteinsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingSoftwareProteinsAlphaFold2contact mapdeep learningdistance mapend-to-end methodsmulti-domain proteinsprotein language modelprotein tertiary structure predictiontemplate-based modelingtemplate-free modeling

Identifiers

PMID38398585
PMCPMC10893003
OpenAlexW4391813968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.