Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398494›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Management of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Critically Ill Patients with Lung Diseases.

Ida Giorgia Iavarone, Lou'i Al-Husinat, Jorge Luis Vélez-Páez, Chiara Robba, Pedro Leme Silva, Patricia R M Rocco, Denise Battaglini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ida Giorgia IavaroneAnesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Lou'i Al-HusinatDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-8330
Jorge Luis Vélez-PáezFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Central de Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-6956-4475
Chiara RobbaAnesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Pedro Leme SilvaLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941, Brazil.
Patricia R M RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-7136
Denise BattagliniAnesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6895-6442

Funding

Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development 408124/2021-0Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation E-26/010.001488/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). NMBAs have been used in critically ill patients with lung diseases to optimize mechanical ventilation, prevent spontaneous respiratory efforts, reduce the work of breathing and oxygen consumption, and avoid patient-ventilator asynchrony. In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), NMBAs reduce the risk of barotrauma and improve oxygenation. Nevertheless, current guidelines and evidence are contrasting regarding the routine use of NMBAs. In status asthmaticus and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NMBAs are used in specific conditions to ameliorate patient-ventilator synchronism and oxygenation, although their routine use is controversial. Indeed, the use of NMBAs has decreased over the last decade due to potential adverse effects, such as immobilization, venous thrombosis, patient awareness during paralysis, development of critical illness myopathy, autonomic interactions, ICU-acquired weakness, and residual paralysis after cessation of NMBAs use. The aim of this review is to highlight current knowledge and synthesize the evidence for the effects of NMBAs for critically ill patients with lung diseases, focusing on patient-ventilator asynchrony, ARDS, status asthmaticus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromechronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseintensive care unitneuromuscular blocking agentsstatus asthmaticus

Identifiers

PMID38398494
PMCPMC10889521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.