Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398415›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Effectiveness of Body Weight-Supported Gait Training on Gait and Balance for Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Rubén Arroyo-Fernández, Raquel Menchero-Sánchez, Diana P Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Helena Romay-Barrero, Araceli Fernández-Maestra, Inés Martínez-Galán

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acute intermittent hypoxia in spinal cord injury gait rehabilitation: a systematic review of randomized trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rubén Arroyo-FernándezFaculty of Physical Therapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6831-2244
Raquel Menchero-SánchezFaculty of Physical Therapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6012-3649
Diana P Pozuelo-CarrascosaFaculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0527-5498
Helena Romay-BarreroFaculty of Physical Therapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2388-2213
Araceli Fernández-MaestraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Hospital for Paraplegics, 45004 Toledo, Spain.
Inés Martínez-GalánFaculty of Physical Therapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESHospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado · ESHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos · ES

Funding

Regional Government of Castile-La Mancha SBPLY/19/180501/000250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review aims to analyse the effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training for improving gait and balance in patients with motor-incomplete spinal cord injuries.

methodRelevant articles were systematically searched in electronic databases to identify randomised controlled trials of body weight-supported gait training (either with methods of robotic, manual, and functional electrical stimulation assistance) versus conventional physical therapy or no intervention. Subjects were >16 years-old with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (AIS C or D). Primary outcomes were gait-related parameters (functionality, endurance, and speed) and balance. Quality of life was included as a secondary outcome. Articles were selected up to 31 December 2023.

resultsFifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 673). Nine studies used robotic assistance, four trials performed manual assistance, one study functional electrical stimulation assistance, and one trial performed the intervention without guidance. Robot-assisted body weight-supported gait training improved walking functionality (SMD = 1.74, CI 95%: 1.09 to 2.39), walking endurance (MD = 26.59 m, CI 95% = 22.87 to 30.31), and balance (SMD = 0.63, CI 95% = 0.24 to 1.02).

conclusionsBody weight-supported gait training is not superior to conventional physiotherapy in gait and balance training in patients with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. However, body weight-supported gait training with robotic assistance does improve walking functionality, walking endurance, and balance, but not walking speed.

Indexed as

balancebody weight-supportedgaitrehabilitationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID38398415
PMCPMC10888564
OpenAlexW4391843442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.