Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398403›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury in Humans: A Systematic Review.

J I Chalif, V S Chavarro, E Mensah, B Johnston, D P Fields, E J Chalif, M Chiang, O Sutton, R Yong, R Trumbower and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06438991 (Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Extremity Motor Function in Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06438991 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Extremity Motor Function in Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2024 to 2028Enrolled10ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsAdjustment of spinal cord stimulation parameters for voluntary motor control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J I ChalifDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1769-5120
V S ChavarroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
E MensahChan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-8674
B JohnstonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6456-3908
D P FieldsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
E J ChalifDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7313-8188
M ChiangHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6492-7812
O SuttonDepartment of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Management, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3334-0533
R YongHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6960-9621
R TrumbowerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2282-9974
Y LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8180-8578

Funding

TRAINING IN TRAUMA AND SEPSIS RESEARCHT32GM008516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TIMOTHY R BILLIAR · 1994 to 2026
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a major health challenge, often leading to significant and permanent sensorimotor and autonomic dysfunctions. This study reviews the evolving role of epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) in treating chronic SCI, focusing on its efficacy and safety. The objective was to analyze how eSCS contributes to the recovery of neurological functions in SCI patients. (2) Methods: We utilized the PRISMA guidelines and performed a comprehensive search across MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases up until September 2023. We identified studies relevant to eSCS in SCI and extracted assessments of locomotor, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and genitourinary functions. (3) Results: A total of 64 studies encompassing 306 patients were identified. Studies investigated various stimulation devices, parameters, and rehabilitation methods. Results indicated significant improvements in motor function: 44% of patients achieved assisted or independent stepping or standing; 87% showed enhanced muscle activity; 65% experienced faster walking speeds; and 80% improved in overground walking. Additionally, eSCS led to better autonomic function, evidenced by improvements in bladder and sexual functions, airway pressures, and bowel movements. Notable adverse effects included device migration, infections, and post-implant autonomic dysreflexia, although these were infrequent. (4) Conclusion: Epidural spinal cord stimulation is emerging as an effective and generally safe treatment for chronic SCI, particularly when combined with intensive physical rehabilitation. Future research on standardized stimulation parameters and well-defined therapy regimens will optimize benefits for specific patient populations.

Indexed as

autonomic functionepidural spinal cord stimulationsensorimotor functionspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID38398403
PMCPMC10889415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.