ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
The Prevalence, Etiology and Treatment of Gastroduodenal Ulcers and Perforation: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-activated trilayer piezoelectric bio-adhesive for rapid repair and antibacterial treatment of gastrointestinal perforation.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Measurement properties of a patient-reported outcome scale for peptic ulcer: a validation study using classical test theory and generalizability theory.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Gastric perforation at the extremes of age: a comparative case report of NSAID-associated high-grade dysplasia versus methamphetamine-induced ischemic perforation.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Association between oral health status and peptic ulcer disease: evidence from a nationally representative survey in Hungary.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Impact of smoking and age on long-term recurrence after laparoscopic primary closure for duodenal ulcer perforation: a 5-year observational study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Association between menopause, postmenopausal hormone therapy and peptic ulcer disease in Taiwanese population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applications of Hydrogels in Emergency Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The global, regional and national burden of peptic ulcer disease attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2021: A population-based study.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Gastroduodenal perforation (GDP) is a life-threatening condition caused by a spontaneous or traumatic event. Treatment should be based on the mechanism of damage, timing, location, extent of the injury, and the patient's clinical condition. We aimed to examine several etiologic factors associated with gastroduodenal perforation and to search for the best method(s) for its prevention and treatment. (2) Methods: We conducted extensive literature reviews by searching numerous studies obtained from PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane for the following keywords: gastroduodenal perforation,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.