Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398218›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Burden Index in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Multimodal Treatment.

Zuzanna Pelc, Katarzyna Sędłak, Radosław Mlak, Magdalena Leśniewska, Katarzyna Mielniczek, Piotr Rola, Jacek Januszewski, Olena Zhaldak, Anna Rekowska, Katarzyna Gęca and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zuzanna PelcDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-9586
Katarzyna SędłakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-1063
Radosław MlakDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7399-8340
Magdalena LeśniewskaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8519-7655
Katarzyna MielniczekDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2575-3642
Piotr RolaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.
Jacek JanuszewskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.
Olena ZhaldakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-5562-9705
Anna RekowskaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-062X
Katarzyna GęcaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.
Magdalena SkórzewskaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5004-9940
Wojciech P PolkowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6455-5636
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7994-9870
Karol Rawicz-PruszyńskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2555-2114
Medical University of Lublin · PLThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since increasing evidence underlines the prominent role of systemic inflammation in carcinogenesis, the inflammation burden index (IBI) has emerged as a promising biomarker to estimate survival outcomes among cancer patients. The IBI has only been validated in Eastern gastric cancer (GC) patients; therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the IBI as a prognostic biomarker in Central European GC patients undergoing multimodal treatment. Ninety-three patients with histologically confirmed GC who underwent multimodal treatment between 2013 and 2021 were included. Patient recruitment started with the standardization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Blood samples were obtained one day prior to surgical treatment. The textbook outcome (TO) served as the measure of surgical quality, and tumor responses to NAC were evaluated according to Becker's system tumor regression grade (TRG). A high IBI was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.13-7.72). In multivariate analysis, a high IBI (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.28-5.13) and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, HR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.32-4.94) were associated with an increased risk of death, while NAC administration (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.90) and TO achievement (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.81) were associated with a lower risk of death. The IBI was associated with postoperative complications and mortality among GC patients undergoing multimodal treatment.

Indexed as

gastric cancerinflammatory burden indexmultimodal treatmentneoadjuvant chemotherapyprognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38398218
PMCPMC10886992
OpenAlexW4391972679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.