Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398201›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Emerging Trends in AI and Radiomics for Bladder, Kidney, and Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.

Georgios Feretzakis, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Arman Tsaturyan, Tarik Emre Sener, Vassilios S Verykios, Dimitrios Karapiperis, Themistoklis Bellos, Stamatios Katsimperis, Panagiotis Angelopoulos, Ioannis Varkarakis and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
21.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. State of the art review of AI in renal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Georgios FeretzakisSchool of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-1187
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Arman TsaturyanEuropean Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Urolithiasis Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2499-7015
Tarik Emre SenerEuropean Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Urolithiasis Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Vassilios S VerykiosSchool of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9758-0819
Dimitrios KarapiperisSchool of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-5988
Themistoklis BellosSecond Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0390-1467
Stamatios KatsimperisSecond Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-1544
Panagiotis AngelopoulosSecond Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.
Ioannis VarkarakisSecond Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.
Andreas SkolarikosSecond Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-6478
Lazaros TzelvesEuropean Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Urolithiasis Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4619-9783
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GREuropean Association of Urology · NLHellenic Open University · GRHaukeland University Hospital · NOInternational Hellenic University · GRUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This comprehensive review critically examines the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of bladder, kidney, and prostate cancers. These cutting-edge technologies are revolutionizing the landscape of cancer care, enhancing both precision and personalization in medical treatments. Our review provides an in-depth analysis of the latest advancements in AI and radiomics, with a specific focus on their roles in urological oncology. We discuss how AI and radiomics have notably improved the accuracy of diagnosis and staging in bladder cancer, especially through advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and CT scans. These tools are pivotal in assessing muscle invasiveness and pathological grades, critical elements in formulating treatment plans. In the realm of kidney cancer, AI and radiomics aid in distinguishing between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and grades. The integration of radiogenomics offers a comprehensive view of disease biology, leading to tailored therapeutic approaches. Prostate cancer diagnosis and management have also seen substantial benefits from these technologies. AI-enhanced MRI has significantly improved tumor detection and localization, thereby aiding in more effective treatment planning. The review also addresses the challenges in integrating AI and radiomics into clinical practice, such as the need for standardization, ensuring data quality, and overcoming the "black box" nature of AI. We emphasize the importance of multicentric collaborations and extensive studies to enhance the applicability and generalizability of these technologies in diverse clinical settings. In conclusion, AI and radiomics represent a major paradigm shift in oncology, offering more precise, personalized, and patient-centric approaches to cancer care. While their potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes, and our understanding of cancer biology is profound, challenges in clinical integration and application persist. We advocate for continued research and development in AI and radiomics, underscoring the need to address existing limitations to fully leverage their capabilities in the field of oncology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebladder cancerdiagnostic imagingkidney canceroncologypersonalized medicineprostate cancerradiomicsurological cancers

Identifiers

PMID38398201
PMCPMC10886599
OpenAlexW4391879548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.