Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398165›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Prediction of a Multi-Gene Assay (Oncotype DX and Mammaprint) Recurrence Risk Group Using Machine Learning in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer-The BRAIN Study.

Jung-Hwan Ji, Sung Gwe Ahn, Youngbum Yoo, Shin-Young Park, Joo-Heung Kim, Ji-Yeong Jeong, Seho Park, Ilkyun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jung-Hwan JiDepartment of Surgery, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon 22711, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1172-535X
Sung Gwe AhnDepartment of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8778-9686
Youngbum YooDepartment of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea.
Shin-Young ParkDepartment of Surgery, Inha University Hospital, College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Joo-Heung KimDepartment of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin 16995, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0417-8434
Ji-Yeong JeongDepartment of AI Research, Neurodigm, Seoul 04790, Republic of Korea.
Seho ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8089-2755
Ilkyun LeeDepartment of Surgery, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon 22711, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model for predicting multi-gene assay (MGA) risk categories. Patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2- breast cancer who had undergone Oncotype DX (ODX) or MammaPrint (MMP) were used to develop the prediction model. The development cohort consisted of a total of 2565 patients including 2039 patients tested with ODX and 526 patients tested with MMP. The MMP risk prediction model utilized a single XGBoost model, and the ODX risk prediction model utilized combined LightGBM, CatBoost, and XGBoost models through soft voting. Additionally, the ensemble (MMP + ODX) model combining MMP and ODX utilized CatBoost and XGBoost through soft voting. Ten random samples, corresponding to 10% of the modeling dataset, were extracted, and cross-validation was performed to evaluate the accuracy on each validation set. The accuracy of our predictive models was 84.8% for MMP, 87.9% for ODX, and 86.8% for the ensemble model. In the ensemble cohort, the sensitivity, specificity, and precision for predicting the low-risk category were 0.91, 0.66, and 0.92, respectively. The prediction accuracy exceeded 90% in several subgroups, with the highest prediction accuracy of 95.7% in the subgroup that met Ki-67 <20 and HG 1~2 and premenopausal status. Our machine learning-based predictive model has the potential to complement existing MGAs in ER+/HER2- breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancermachine learningmulti-gene assayprediction model

Identifiers

PMID38398165
PMCPMC10887075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.