Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398164›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Therapeutic Decision Making in Prevascular Mediastinal Tumors Using CT Radiomics and Clinical Features: Upfront Surgery or Pretreatment Needle Biopsy?

Chao-Chun Chang, Chia-Ying Lin, Yi-Sheng Liu, Ying-Yuan Chen, Wei-Li Huang, Wu-Wei Lai, Yi-Ting Yen, Mi-Chia Ma, Yau-Lin Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chao-Chun ChangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9116-8383
Chia-Ying LinDepartment of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.
Yi-Sheng LiuDepartment of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.
Ying-Yuan ChenDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.
Wei-Li HuangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.
Wu-Wei LaiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.
Yi-Ting YenDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.
Mi-Chia MaDepartment of Statistics and Institute of Data Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1949-3004
Yau-Lin TsengDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.

Funding

National Cheng Kung University Hospital NCKUH-11201007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) classification models for differentiating patients who needed direct surgery from patients who needed core needle biopsy among patients with prevascular mediastinal tumor (PMT). Patients with PMT who received a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan and initial management for PMT between January 2010 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen ML algorithms were used to construct candidate classification models via the voting ensemble approach, based on preoperative clinical data and radiomic features extracted from the CECT. The classification accuracy of clinical diagnosis was 86.1%. The first ensemble learning model was built by randomly choosing seven ML models from a set of fourteen ML models and had a classification accuracy of 88.0% (95% CI = 85.8 to 90.3%). The second ensemble learning model was the combination of five ML models, including NeuralNetFastAI, NeuralNetTorch, RandomForest with Entropy, RandomForest with Gini, and XGBoost, and had a classification accuracy of 90.4% (95% CI = 87.9 to 93.0%), which significantly outperformed clinical diagnosis (

Indexed as

core needle biopsymachine learningprevascular tumorsradiomicssurgical resectionthymomavoting ensemble

Identifiers

PMID38398164
PMCPMC10886806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.