Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398139›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Leiomyogenic Tumor of the Spine: A Systematic Review.

Abdurrahman F Kharbat, Kishore Balasubramanian, Kiran Sankarappan, Ryan D Morgan, Khawaja M Hassan, Paolo Palmisciano, Panayiotis E Pelargos, Michael Chukwu, Othman Bin Alamer, Ali S Haider and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abdurrahman F KharbatDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Kishore BalasubramanianDivision of Neurosurgery, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Bryan, TX 77807, USA.
Kiran SankarappanDivision of Neurosurgery, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Bryan, TX 77807, USA.
Ryan D MorganDivision of Neurosurgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Khawaja M HassanDepartment of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-6177-7575
Paolo PalmiscianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Panayiotis E PelargosDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Michael ChukwuDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Othman Bin AlamerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburg, PA 15219, USA.
Ali S HaiderDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Tarek Y El AhmadiehDepartment of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
John F BurkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study cohort consisted of 83 patients with a mean age of 49.55 (SD 13.72) with a female preponderance (60 patients). Here, 32.14% of patients had primary LTS; the remaining were metastases. Clinical presentation included nonspecific back pain (57.83%), weakness (21.69%) and radicular pain (18.07%). History of uterine neoplasia was found in 33.73% of patients. LTS preferentially affected the thoracic spine (51.81%), followed by the lumbar (21.67%) spine. MRI alone was the most common imaging modality (33.33%); in other cases, it was used with CT (22.92%) or X-ray (16.67%); 19.23% of patients had Resection/Fixation, 15.38% had Total en bloc spondylectomy, and 10.26% had Corpectomy. A minority of patients had laminectomy and decompression. Among those with resection, 45.83% had a gross total resection, 29.17% had a subtotal resection, and 16.67% had a near total resection. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positivity for actin (43.37%), desmin (31.33%), and Ki67 (25.30). At a follow-up of 19.3 months, 61.97% of patients were alive; 26.25% of 80 patients received no additional treatment, 23.75% received combination radiotherapy and chemotherapy, only chemotherapy was given to 20%, and radiotherapy was given to 17.5%. Few (2.5%) had further resection. For an average of 12.50 months, 42.31% had no symptoms, while others had residual (19.23%), other metastasis (15.38%), and pain (7.69%). On follow-up of 29 patients, most (68.97%) had resolved symptoms; 61.97% of the 71 patients followed were alive.

Indexed as

en bloc resection leiomyomaleiomyogenic tumorleiomyoma spine resectionspine leiomyomaspine leiomyoma immunohistochemistryspine leiomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID38398139
PMCPMC10887395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.