Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398108›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Treatment Strategies Guided by [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and [18F]FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes.

Ester P Olthof, Hans H B Wenzel, Jacobus van der Velden, Lukas J A Stalpers, Constantijne H Mom, Maaike A van der Aa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Head-to-head comparison ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Phytochemical analysis,Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ester P OlthofDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1941-7693
Hans H B WenzelDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jacobus van der VeldenCentre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lukas J A StalpersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1055 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Constantijne H MomCentre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2838-2031
Maaike A van der AaDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society IKNL2019-12398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern treatment guidelines for women with advanced cervical cancer recommend staging using 2-deoxy-2-[

methodsWomen diagnosed between 2009 and 2017, who received chemoradiotherapy for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IB2, IIA2-IVB cervical cancer with an [

resultsAmong the 434 eligible patients with [

conclusionWhile existing guidelines advocate [

Indexed as

18FDGboostdebulkingextended-field radiotherapylocally advanced stagelymphatic metastasesPET/CTuterine cervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID38398108
PMCPMC10887300
OpenAlexW4391644285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.