Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38398073›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in Patients with Diffuse Gliomas.

Marija Bušić, Zoran Rumboldt, Dora Čerina, Željko Bušić, Krešimir Dolić

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marija BušićDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Zoran RumboldtSchool of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Ulica Braće Branchetta 20/1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Dora ČerinaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Željko BušićDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Krešimir DolićDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.
University of Split · HRUniversity of Rijeka · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate potential posttreatment changes in ADC values within the tissue surrounding the enhancing lesion, particularly in areas not exhibiting MRI characteristics of involvement. Additionally, the objective was to investigate the correlations among ADC values, treatment response, and survival outcomes in individuals diagnosed with gliomas. This retrospective study included a total of 49 patients that underwent either stereotactic biopsy or maximal surgical resection. Histologically confirmed as Grade III or IV gliomas, all cases adhered to the 2016 and 2021 WHO classifications, with subsequent radio-chemotherapy administered post-surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: short and long survival groups. Baseline and follow-up MRI scans were obtained on a 1.5 T MRI scanner. Two ROI circles were positioned near the enhancing area, one ROI in the NAWM ipsilateral to the neoplasm and another symmetrically in the contralateral hemisphere on ADC maps. At follow-up there was a significant difference in both ipsilateral and contralateral NAWM between the two groups, -0.0857 (

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientbiomarkersgliomamagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID38398073
PMCPMC10886867
OpenAlexW4391576489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.