Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397973›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

National Development in the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Repeated Cross-Sectional Studies from 1998 to 2018.

Allan Klitgaard, Rikke Ibsen, Jesper Lykkegaard, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allan KlitgaardDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6805-5695
Rikke Ibseni2minds, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper LykkegaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6705 Esbjerg, Denmark.
Ole HilbergDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3075-3463
Anders LøkkeDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim (Denmark) AGR- 2018- 731- 5845Eva Merete Falck Crone Foundation N/ARegion of Southern Denmark N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recommendations for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have shifted towards a more restrictive use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). We aimed to identify the nationwide development over time in the use of ICS treatment in COPD. We conducted a register-based repeated cross-sectional study using Danish nationwide registers. On a yearly basis from 1998 to 2018, we included all patients in Denmark ≥ 40 years of age with an ICD-10 diagnosis of COPD (J44). Accumulated ICS use was calculated for each year based on redeemed prescriptions. Patients were divided into the following groups: No ICS, low-dose ICS, medium-dose ICS, or high-dose ICS. From 1998 to 2018, the yearly proportion of patients without ICS treatment increased (from 50.6% to 57.6%), the proportion of patients on low-dose ICS treatment increased (from 11.3% to 14.9%), and the proportion of patients on high-dose ICS treatment decreased (from 17.0% to 9.4%). We demonstrated a national reduction in the use of ICS treatment in COPD from 1998 to 2018, with an increase in the proportion of patients without ICS and on low-dose ICS treatment and a decrease in the proportion of patients on high-dose ICS treatment.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseinhaled corticosteroidsinhaled medicationnationwide developmentpharmacoepidemiologytreatment recommendations

Identifiers

PMID38397973
PMCPMC10886715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.