Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397725›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Are We the Problem? A Call to Action for Addressing Institutional Challenges to Engaging Community Partners in Research.

Neha Hippalgaonkar, Ryan Huu-Tuan Nguyen, Eliza Brumer Cohn, Joseph Horowitz, Ana Williams Waite, Tigist Mersha, Christen Sandoval, Sarah Khan, Kauthar Salum, Paris Thomas and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neha HippalgaonkarDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Ryan Huu-Tuan NguyenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Eliza Brumer CohnFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98126, USA.
Joseph HorowitzDepartment of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Ana Williams WaiteUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Tigist MershaUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Christen SandovalSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Sarah KhanSinai Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Kauthar SalumFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98126, USA.
Paris ThomasEqual Hope, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Anne Marie MurphySchool of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Beulah BrentSisters Working It Out, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Lolita ColemanSisters Working It Out, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Paramjeet KhoslaSinai Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Kent F HoskinsDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Vida HendersonFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98126, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5799-0664
Leslie R CarnahanUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5813-2757
University of Illinois Chicago · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USIllinois College · US

Funding

Promoting Genetic Counseling among African American Women with Hereditary Risk for Breast CancerK01CA248852 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HENDERSON, VIDA ANN · 2020 to 2024
$809k
American Cancer Society CHERC-MSI-21-168-01-CHERC-MSINCI NIH HHS K01 CA248852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-engaged research (CEnR) is a potent tool for addressing health inequities and fostering equitable relationships among communities, researchers, and institutions. CEnR involves collaboration throughout the research process, demonstrating improvements in study recruitment and retention, intervention efficacy, program sustainability, capacity building among partners, and enhanced cultural relevance. Despite the increasing demand for CEnR, institutional policies, particularly human participation protection training (HPP), lag behind, creating institutional barriers to community partnerships. Here, we highlight challenges encountered in our ongoing study, Fostering Opportunities in Research through Messaging and Education (FOR ME), focused on promoting shared decision-making around clinical trial participation among Black women diagnosed with breast cancer. Grounded in CEnR methods, FOR ME has a partnership with a community-based organization (CBO) that addresses the needs of Black women with breast cancer. Our CBO partner attempted to obtain HPP training, which was administratively burdensome and time-consuming. As CEnR becomes more prevalent, academic and research institutions, along with researchers, are faced with a call to action to become more responsive to community partner needs. Accordingly, we present a guide to HPP training for community partners, addressing institutional barriers to community partner participation in research. This guide outlines multiple HPP training pathways for community partners, aiming to minimize institutional barriers and enhance their engagement in research with academic partners.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity ParticipationFemaleHumansResearch Designbreast neoplasmcancer survivorsclinical trialdecision makinghealth disparityminority and vulnerable populationspatient participation

Identifiers

PMID38397725
PMCPMC10888328
OpenAlexW4391931416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.