Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397656›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Are mHealth Interventions Effective in Improving the Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services among Adolescents? A Scoping Review.

Nazeema Isaacs, Xolani Ntinga, Thabo Keetsi, Lindelwa Bhembe, Bongumenzi Mthembu, Allanise Cloete, Candice Groenewald

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nazeema IsaacsHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Xolani NtingaHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Thabo KeetsiHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Lindelwa BhembeHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Bongumenzi MthembuHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Allanise CloeteHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-9675
Candice GroenewaldHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2731-1370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents continue to face challenges to their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) both locally and internationally. Digital technologies such as the Internet, text messaging, and social media are often viewed as valuable tools for disseminating information on SRH. Mobile health, also known as mHealth, is a medical and public health practise that uses these digital technologies to communicate information. The literature has revealed that mHealth interventions have a positive outcome in delivering SRH information to adolescents. This review aimed to synthesise empirical studies that evaluate mHealth interventions and assess the extent to which these mHealth interventions promote sexual and reproductive health outcomes among young people. This scoping review reviewed the literature across four databases, including EBSCOhost, Scopus, Proquest, and Cochrane, and included 12 articles. The findings have shown that mHealth interventions are effective in enhancing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge and attitudes among young people in both low-middle and high-income countries. However, comprehensive longitudinal studies are necessary to measure the sustainability and long-term influence of mHealth interventions on behaviour. It is recommended that with artificial intelligence (AI) improvements, there is a possible path to bolstering mHealth interventions.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneReproductive Health ServicesTelemedicineAdolescentArtificial IntelligenceHumansReproductive HealthSexual Behaviorhigh-income countriesinterventionslow-middle income countriesmHealthsexual reproductive health (SRH)

Identifiers

PMID38397656
PMCPMC10888173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.